Of course, the female body is nothing to be ashamed of – and the argument that if men can saunter around topless, women should be able to as well, is eminently sensible. Breasts are not distasteful – but in this context, the tactic is misplaced. The ideological statement the action ends up reinforcing is this – that showing your breasts is inherently liberating, and covering up is a necessary signifier of sexist oppression. Women’s liberation cannot be reduced to measuring the amount of flesh we’re permitted to show. What is particularly negative is that the protest buys into the rhetoric, pushed by imperialists, that Islam is uniquely oppressive to women.
—
That’s not what a feminist looks like.
Women’s liberation cannot be reduced to measuring the amount of flesh we’re permitted to show.
Women’s liberation cannot be reduced to measuring the amount of flesh we’re permitted to show.
Women’s liberation cannot be reduced to measuring the amount of flesh we’re permitted to show.
Repeat until you get it.
(via stay-human)
Thank you! I do believe that the way society confronts female sexuality is a microcosm of how it confronts women in any sphere they aren’t used to seeing women in… but the fact that so many people think that female sexuality and liberation from sexual double standards is the only thing we should be focused on is disconcerting. It takes up so much of feminist discussions when there are so many other discussions we need to be having like: women’s fundamental human rights, women and violence, women and disparities in representation, women and financial security, women and education, women and social conditioning, etc. Obviously, our bodies and our sexual relationships are important but like… that’s not the only thing that’s important. There’s so much more at stake.
(via starbucksandshakespeare)
(via madamethursday)